Hondata K-Pro w/ Auto Trans

[l7h8626]

Originally Posted by kuma912

What kind of bolt ons?

*Nevermind. Saw the dyno vids

ya, i add link to that post.

[Benz]

Originally Posted by l7h8626

full bolt-ons with stock k-pro map = 199.6 hp / 158.5 tq

after tuning 216 hp / 179.2 tq

04 AT

I'd like to start and official Dyno Charts thread

Good job dude. Wow...that's pretty good number. How much did the tuning cost you? I can't find a reputable shop locally to tune it right..

Originally Posted by kuma912

The difference between a good tune and a bad tune is about 10-20whp. So its not a big deal. Right now I really wish Kpro was out for 2007. I already have the 06 ecu along with other stuff. Everyone is always putting down the AT. We'll see.

That's very true. I can't wait to see your car done, you've got everything ready!! AT represent!

[kuma912]

Originally Posted by Benz

That's very true. I can't wait to see your car done, you've got everything ready!! AT represent!

I want Kpro.....

[SoCaliTrojan]

Originally Posted by samxeyeam

^ but here's the thing with the AT... if you drag race /w AT, you get perfect shifts all the time while with the MT you can miss shift... Also there is timing with MT shifting and all that little BS while the AT you get the same constant shifts... I used to laugh at people modding AT's until I went out to the drag strip and lost to a couple of AT's because I either shifted too early or late or even miss the gate to the next gear...

So, in other words, MT's suck because of your driving skill? If you did not "either shifted too early or late or even miss the gate to the next gear," would you have won?

Normally, on equally matched cars, a MT will beat an AT. The AT's computer isn't programmed for drag racing. Yes, AT's will shift perfectly...but that doesn't mean they shift at the most optimal time. In some cases, it may shift early (while a MT driver will keep it in the high rpm's).

Your statement would make more sense if you said that you lost to AT's despite shifting perfectly in the MT. You admit you messed up, so now you think AT is better? *shrug*

[ProjectTSX-N54]

after you guys got the K-pro for $1995, how much more you guys paid for dyno tuning and muchining the VTC to 45 degree and so on? I want to know the true cost

anybody?

[samxeyeam]

Originally Posted by SoCaliTrojan

So, in other words, MT's suck because of your driving skill? If you did not "either shifted too early or late or even miss the gate to the next gear," would you have won?

Normally, on equally matched cars, a MT will beat an AT. The AT's computer isn't programmed for drag racing. Yes, AT's will shift perfectly...but that doesn't mean they shift at the most optimal time. In some cases, it may shift early (while a MT driver will keep it in the high rpm's).

Your statement would make more sense if you said that you lost to AT's despite shifting perfectly in the MT. You admit you messed up, so now you think AT is better? *shrug*

Calm down fido. I was just pointing out the advantage AT's have over the MT's... Did I ever say either or is better or say MT's suck? We are all human and even myself have missed the gate several times on the drag strip, a mistake is a mistake... I'm sorry Mr. race car driver and your flawless, everytime perfect, shifts.

[samxeyeam]

Originally Posted by ProjectTSX-N54

after you guys got the K-pro for $1995, how much more you guys paid for dyno tuning and muchining the VTC to 45 degree and so on? I want to know the true cost

anybody?

My neighbor had his machined and tuned and it cost him about 200 for the machining of the VTC and about 300 for a tune... Also, he had to get the wide band O2 sensor which was another 300ish? I dont remember the exact prices but thats what I remember being around... I'll ask him later on today when he gets home...

[ProjectTSX-N54]

so more less around 3000? deam, for another 1000 I can get the SC