|
|
Welcome to TSXClub.com.
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join TSXClub.com today!
|
10-30-2005, 03:54 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Registered Member
|
TSX engine is basically the same as the Accord EXCEPT we're more stroked with a different ECU mapping, so we get more HP and torque.
The K24A2 doesn't compare to the V6s in any of the other car... its an i4 they're V6s. To date, yes all the J32s (V6 models) are SOHC and not i-VTEC. They've just done it that way and no other reason to have DOHC when you're getting all the HP and efficiency you need.
__________________
CG/Ebony/Non-Navi/6MT
TSX Key Mod
Comptech:
Short-Shifter, Exhaust, Header, Springs, RSB
RT Cat
Hood & Trunk Shocks
KPTech Window Up, VSA off, 1-Touch Sunroof
Hondata Gasket, Reflash
My Cardomain
|
|
|
10-30-2005, 07:18 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Registered Member
My Ride: Acura TSX 2004/BMW 745i Sport
|
nah the heads of the K24A on TSX and Accord r totally different~
plus the i-VTEC on both car is function in totally different purposes ..
one for performance and one for better fuel comsumpsion (2 vtec rock vs 1 vtec rock, forgot if it's called rock ... srry for the bad english)
even u somehow ultimated ur Accord LE ECU to somewut TSX like.. the 2 engine r totally different in other aspects ... i think we went over this many times b4 .. do some search
in other words ... the K24A on TSX is acutally more identical to the K20A on RSX-S
than Accord's ~ it's basically a long stroke version of the K20A2
|
|
|
10-30-2005, 09:04 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
TSX of the Month Winner
My Ride: 04 Pearl White TSX 6spd
|
You can find most of your answers here
__________________
 
That's some good sh*t!!!
|
|
|
11-01-2005, 07:56 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
 Ex-Moderator Emeritus
My Ride: TSX '04 CG/Ebony 5AT Nav
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by moda_way
TSX engine is basically the same as the Accord EXCEPT we're more stroked with a different ECU mapping, so we get more HP and torque......
|
That's what I had thought.
But when we were talking about this a few months ago, I thought Noel said there were no mechanical differences at all.
I suppose I could have missed some nuances though.
This is actually a long-time debate on all the TSX sites. I'm surprised it's so hard to pin down. I've been thinking of just writing to Honda/Acura and asking straight-out if they could tell us exactly what the differences are, and maybe when I get a little spare time  I will.
Whenever we discuss it, most of the car-philes say there's no difference between the TSX and the Euro, then when we get further into it some people say there ARE some differences but they're only minor, and we argue about how major or minor they are, and then somebody else comes in and says it's not true, there are no differences at all. 
|
|
|
11-01-2005, 11:54 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
 Administrator General Operations
Location: 33.87°S 151.21°E
My Ride: TOTM November 04 ホンダ CL9 アコード B-92P
|
I just saw my name being mentioned.
Erm Larch, the comparison here isn't the TSX vs Accord Euro. It's the USDM Accord which if I'm not wrong shares the same engine as the CRV instead. You getting confused or am I confused now?
|
|
|
11-02-2005, 01:55 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
 Ex-Moderator Emeritus
My Ride: TSX '04 CG/Ebony 5AT Nav
|
OK, let's take a poll: Who thinks Larchmont was confused, and who thinks Noel was confused?
Hint: The answer begins with L. 
|
|
|
11-02-2005, 03:09 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Registered Member
My Ride: Acura TSX 2004/BMW 745i Sport
|
denfinitely be u, my frd ... ~
he is the "Global Technical Support" 
and u can see he is getting imporvement on the response time from 72hrs to 24hrs ..  good work Noel
or maybe im confused ?? ~ cuz when u first mentioned Noel said they r the same thing ... i was really confused 
|
|
|
11-02-2005, 08:02 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
 Administrator General Operations
Location: 33.87°S 151.21°E
My Ride: TOTM November 04 ホンダ CL9 アコード B-92P
|
|
|
|
11-02-2005, 11:59 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
 Ex-Moderator Emeritus
My Ride: TSX '04 CG/Ebony 5AT Nav
|
You're definitely NOT confused. Indeed what you had said was about the TSX and the Euro Accord.
I was confusing this thread with another one where we were talking about THOSE two cars, and so I referred to what you said (a long time ago) about THAT comparison.
My bad.
|
|
|
11-02-2005, 02:15 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Registered Member
My Ride: Acura/Integra GSR/1996
|
The TL might not have i-VTEC, but it still has VTEC. Makes you sort of wonder if they did make the V6 DOHC with i-VTEC, what kind of performance would you get? The NSX has DOHC, so I can get an idea of the kind of performance increase, but I'd assume that i-VTEC would give you even more.
__________________
2005 Honda Pilot EX-L (desert rock metallic)
1996 Acura Integra GS-R sedan (black currant pearl)
1995 Yamaha FZR600
|
|
|
11-02-2005, 05:57 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
 Administrator General Operations
Location: 33.87°S 151.21°E
My Ride: TOTM November 04 ホンダ CL9 アコード B-92P
|
The C32b found in the NA1/2 is unique in that category. All other Honda V6s are SOHC VTEC. The DOHC is strictly restricted to its supercar flagship. Why Honda has not pursued developments in that direction could be the fact that it can/could topple the NA1/2 making it "phased-out". So, until the new NSX is produced and completed. I don't think we'd see any improvements in this aspect.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:52 AM.
|